Three things you learn from long use
Anyone who has used exterior ballistics programs for long enough tends to arrive at three conclusions. First, given the same inputs, every reputable program produces the same answer. Second, all of them ask you for a muzzle velocity and a ballistic coefficient (BC). Third, not one of them tells you where those two numbers are supposed to come from.
Oehler calls the third point the missing link. Over the past century the methods ballisticians use for downrange prediction have not changed much. The computer replaced the hand work of looking up Siacci tables, which made the computation faster and easier, but it did nothing about where the input data comes from.
The three required inputs
A downrange ballistic prediction needs three inputs: a known muzzle velocity as the starting point, a drag function that suits the bullet, and a ballistic coefficient relating that bullet to that drag function. The program itself handles the differences in air density and speed of sound caused by pressure, temperature and humidity.
Of the three, muzzle velocity is the simple one. A chronograph measures the actual velocity of this lot of ammunition from this rifle.
G1 or G7 is not the real question
Choosing a drag function is less difficult than it is made out to be. G1 is in general use and most manufacturers publish their ballistic coefficients against it, and G1 works perfectly well at intermediate range, say 400 to 800 yards. In recent years it has become clearer that G7 fits streamlined bullets designed for long range better, and usually predicts better through the transonic region.
Both share one condition. Paired with the correct ballistic coefficient, G1 and G7 both give reasonable predictions until velocity falls into the transonic region, typically taken as Mach 1.2, about 1350 feet per second. There is no one drag function that fits everything; G7 is simply closer to modern bullets.
The ballistic coefficient is the unreliable input
Shooters are used to seeing a BC printed to three decimal places, and naturally assume it is good to three significant digits. In reality the ballistic coefficient is hard to measure better than a few percent, different lots of the same product can differ by several percent, and BC is affected by barrel twist, muzzle crown and other rifle characteristics.
The measuring distance matters even more. Most ballistic coefficients in circulation are measured within a few hundred yards of the muzzle and then extrapolated downrange using the chosen drag function. Oehler puts it bluntly: a coach cannot predict marathon performance from a sprint time, and using a short range test to predict long range behavior is no more reliable.
The irony is that many shooters who would never enter a catalog or reloading manual velocity as their muzzle velocity will treat a published three decimal ballistic coefficient as a sacred constant.
Solve backwards: force theory and measurement to agree at both ends
System 88 runs the process in reverse. Normally you give the program a muzzle velocity and a ballistic coefficient and it computes a time of flight. System 88 measures long range time of flight and muzzle velocity, and its built in program solves backwards for the one ballistic coefficient that makes the predicted time of flight exactly equal the measured time of flight.
The user can pick any of the common drag functions, or define one. For any drag function, System 88 finds the ballistic coefficient that fits both the long range measurement and the muzzle velocity. Change the drag function and it again forces theory and measurement to agree at the muzzle and at the distant target.
Plot it as distance against time and this becomes obvious. The curve starts at zero time and zero distance, its initial slope is the muzzle velocity, and its end point is the measured time of flight. Overlay the curves produced by different drag functions and they nearly coincide. In other words the fit to that one far measured point matters far more than the choice of drag function. G1 and G7 serve equally well short of the transonic region, provided you have actually measured the long range time of flight.
A measurement system built for field work
System 88 is set up for professional field use. It runs on batteries, so it works at remote ranges with no power supply. Setup is quick and simple. The wireless link is verified to one mile. One person can operate it, and results are available within seconds of the shot.
At the muzzle it uses the proven Oehler skyscreen. Downrange it uses a ruggedized microphone, with square, fly-by and fly-over acoustic targets available. A single shot can yield several targets and several ballistic coefficients, and an impact target can be added to measure subsonic time of flight. Data exports to Excel and PDF, and Oehler provides technical support.
